The News
Pat Eckert, a German beverage professional, conducted a global assessment of energy drinks from all six continents using a 36-criteria framework. He and his team collected samples, tested them in labs, and created the Six Continents Index. The study revealed regional differences in product philosophies, with Europe focusing on pasteurisation and Asia preferring real sugar.
Energy‑drink formulations vary dramatically across the globe.
The Six Continents Index, released on May 18 2026, compares energy‑drink formulations worldwide using 36 objective criteria that cover pasteurisation and ingredient transparency. Europe leads the overall score while North America ranks lowest, a contrast between revenue dominance and product quality.
Pasteurisation rates are 85.7 % for European products versus 12 % in North America.
Asian brands contain real sugar in 78.9 % of their offerings, whereas North American brands rely on artificial sweeteners in 84 % and real sugar only 8 %. For venues that emphasize clean‑label ingredients, European or Asian options may appeal more.
Only 1.4 % of global energy drinks carry BPA‑free labels, indicating many brands still use conventional packaging additives.
North America accounts for over 35 % of the $87.8 billion global market but its products rank lowest in quality. The gap could influence consumer preferences toward healthier ingredients.
Thailand’s consumption grew 19 % between 2020 and 2023, signalling a growing market for real‑sugar energy drinks.
Aspartame is present in 10.5 % of products overall, with 43 % of those found in Africa—an element that distributors may need to monitor for compliance.
The study underscores a clear mismatch between product quality and market share: Europe scores high while North America ranks low, despite its large revenue share.
Original Press Release
WORLDWIDE COLLECTION & ASSESSMENT
Pat Eckert, an internationally recognised German beverage professional and certified water sommelier, realised that nobody had ever created an objective global ranking of energy drinks. This was despite energy drinks being one of the world’s largest and most discussed beverage categories, while cars, phones, wines, films, and many other consumer sectors already have serious worldwide rankings.
So over roughly half a year, he and his team collected energy drinks from all six inhabited continents and assessed each one using the same professional 36-criteria framework, focused on measurable product quality, ingredients, transparency, and formulation standards. Top-performing products were submitted for laboratory testing and analytical verification. This became the Six Continents Index - built to be professional, rigorous, and objective.
The original goal was simple: to identify which brands objectively perform best worldwide.
However, during the assessment, another finding emerged almost accidentally: energy drinks are not really the same category across continents. Different regions follow very different product philosophies - from Europe’s strong focus on pasteurisation, to Asia’s preference for real sugar, to North America’s heavy reliance on artificial formulations, sweeteners and preservatives.
So the project ultimately became both the world’s first objective global energy drink ranking and a snapshot of how differently the category is formulated around the world.
THE SHOCK FINDINGS
• Europe goes natural. South America goes artificial.
85.7% of European energy drinks were pasteurised, compared with 12% in North America and under 1% in South America.
• Asia still uses real sugar. North America barely does.
In Asia, 78.9% of energy drinks used real sugar. In North America: just 8%. They are effectively drinking a different product.
• North America runs on sweeteners. The rest of the world mostly does not.
84% of North American energy drinks relied entirely on artificial sweeteners. In Europe: just 4.2%. In Asia, Australia, South America, and Africa: almost none.
• Australia vitaminizes. North America simplifies.
Australian drinks averaged 4.2 vitamins per product, compared with just 2.9 in North America.
• Aspartame is still used worldwide, especially in Africa
Aspartame (classified by WHO/IARC as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2B)), was used in 10.5% of products worldwide, with 43% of those aspartame-containing products found in Africa.
• BPA-free labelling was almost invisible worldwide.
Only 1.4% of the global sample clearly carried BPA-free labelling.
• North America - the world’s largest energy drink market by revenue - ranked last overall among the six continents.
Europe pasteurises. North America sweetens artificially. Asia uses real sugar. Australia vitaminizes. Same category, completely different product philosophies.
GLOBAL BRAND NOTES
Among the many brands assessed across six continents, two stood out for reasons beyond the ranking. Red Bull was the only energy drink brand found in virtually every market assessed worldwide, while Japan’s Lipovitan-D was the oldest brand in the study, having been on the market since 1962.
HIGHEST-SCORING PRODUCTS
At the continental level, Europe achieved the highest overall score in the index. Australia & Oceania ranked second, followed by Asia in third place.
At brand level, HELL Energy from Hungary achieved the highest overall score for objective product quality in the index. Second place went to 28 BLACK from Germany, followed by TAKE OFF, also from Germany.
FULL FINDINGS
Further findings, methodology, and background information are available on request.
Sources consulted (web research):
- Six Continents Index Releases First Global Assessment Revealing Major…
- The Worlds First Global Energy Drink Ranking Accidentally Revealed So…
- Whats Actually Your Energy Drink Depends Where You 929
- Energy Drinks Market 112182
- Energy Drinks Market
- Energy Drinks Market
- Energy Drinks Market
- Global Energy Drink Industry Analysis
Source: EIN Presswire